[PD] why not Purr Data?

Alexander Connor a.connexx at runbox.com
Sun Oct 1 23:00:00 CEST 2017


Increased processing overhead with the new GUI  -- assuming that matters with a specific computer set-up.





On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 13:48:09 -0400, Ali Momeni <batchku at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I've been playing around with the latest Purr Data from:
> https://agraef.github.io/purr-data/
> 
> and, well, I love it.  The entire experience of working with Pd is much
> more pleasant.
> 
> I'm compelled to ask the group, especially the Pd Vanilla users among us,
> the following simple question:
> 
> What reason is there NOT to use Purr Data?
> 
> Am I missing something?
> Subtle disadvantages?
> Missing functionality?
> Reliability?
> Performance?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ali
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





More information about the Pd-list mailing list