[PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 16:19:24 CEST 2017

I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo,
arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to automatically
encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr data? I saw
something once where you could select a portion of the patch and do it.


2017-10-03 6:59 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>:

> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the
> > -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently
> > offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly
> > inconsistent behaviors...
> Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with
> Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches
> I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now.
> Roman
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171003/078b277c/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list