[PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
esaruoho at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 19:33:41 CEST 2017
So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a
faster mac or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get
rid of the GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage
I've been having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData?
On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> 2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>:
>> I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates
>> the current selection inside an abstraction.
> This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork
> 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me
> into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data.
> How crazy am I?
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho //
+358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage
esaruoho at gmail.com //
http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com //
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list