[PD] initbang in vanilla (was Re: how to destroy/delete an object with dynamic patching?)

Miller Puckette msp at ucsd.edu
Sun Oct 22 23:52:47 CEST 2017

I've been thinking about some sort of such extention of loadbang - also
to allow you to specify the message, as in "loadbang 5" - I think that would
get a lot of use.  But I don't have a solid sense of what the design should
be (and am always afraid of implementing something before I understand all
the issues; if I do something stupid then its there forever :)


On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 08:44:25PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> Or [loadbang] could have a second outlet for init bangs...
> > On Oct 22, 2017, at 7:35 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> > 
> > I can think of an easier solution that doesn't even require another Pd
> > object: [loadbang] could take a non zero argument to turn it into
> > [initbang]. That'd be so easy to implement that even I could do it... (it's
> > just action = LB_INIT instead of LB_LOAD). This would also be backwards
> > compatible, of course. I could even go ahead and make a PR for that.
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

More information about the Pd-list mailing list