[PD] soundfiler issues

[Dan Wilcox]

Yes it's a bug. I only tested with the built-in samples in the soundfiler-help patch which are 44.1kz and as Lucas discovered, higher values are truncated leading to incorrect numbers.

Here is a tentative fix: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/240 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/240>

> On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:21 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:47:09 +0200
> From: Philipp Schmalfuß <philipp.schmalfuss at uni-weimar.de <mailto:philipp.schmalfuss at uni-weimar.de>>
> To: pd-list at mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at mail.iem.at>
> Subject: [PD] soundfiler issues
> Message-ID: <20171027164709.17476649s1qw11oo at webmail.uni-weimar.de <mailto:20171027164709.17476649s1qw11oo at webmail.uni-weimar.de>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
> 	format="flowed"
> 
> dear list,
> 
> i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler]  
> recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly  
> (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz  
> files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate  
> of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?



--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171028/b8169ad3/attachment.html>