[PD] soundfiler issues

Lucas Cordiviola lucarda27 at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 28 21:00:45 CEST 2017

Thanx Dan,

Your fix (PR #240) is working nicely. Tested on Windows and Linux.


Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.

On 10/28/2017 8:02 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Yes it's a bug. I only tested with the built-in samples in the soundfiler-help patch which are 44.1kz and as Lucas discovered, higher values are truncated leading to incorrect numbers.

Here is a tentative fix: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/240

On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:21 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at<mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:

Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:47:09 +0200
From: Philipp Schmalfuß <philipp.schmalfuss at uni-weimar.de<mailto:philipp.schmalfuss at uni-weimar.de>>
To: pd-list at mail.iem.at<mailto:pd-list at mail.iem.at>
Subject: [PD] soundfiler issues
Message-ID: <20171027164709.17476649s1qw11oo at webmail.uni-weimar.de<mailto:20171027164709.17476649s1qw11oo at webmail.uni-weimar.de>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";

dear list,

i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler]
recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly
(haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz
files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate
of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?

Dan Wilcox

Pd-list at lists.iem.at<mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171028/b035535d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list