[PD] A "set" method for [value]

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Sun Oct 29 06:19:53 CET 2017

I always find additions to vanilla useful :)

maybe a design like [send], if it has no argument, then you have a 2nd
inlet where you can set it

I suspect the problem sometimes is not being hard or easy to implement, but
getting the design right and sure you're doing a nice thing.


2017-10-29 2:35 GMT-02:00 Liam Goodacre <liamg_uw at hotmail.com>:

> You know what would be a really useful feature? A "set" method for
> [value], so that you can redefine which [value] you're tuned into, like the
> right inlet on the [array] objects.
> Would other people use this? It seems to me that it would be easily
> implementable and would have no effect on backwards compatibility.
> Liam
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171029/d5450ed9/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list