[PD] A "set" method for [value]

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Sun Oct 29 11:20:21 CET 2017

Happy Halloween: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241>

Since [value] only works with floats (and not symbols), I think a set message shouldn't break anything and (helpfully) result in "got symbol but expected float" errors in earlier versions of Pd as opposed to non connections with a missing second inlet.

> On Oct 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> I was thinking that it could be done through the main inlet using a "set" message, just like the tabread and tabwrite objects. But a second inlet might be good also. What could go wrong?

Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171029/8489c1b7/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list