[PD] A "set" method for [value]
liamg_uw at hotmail.com
Sun Oct 29 12:28:15 CET 2017
Oh wow, thanks Dan! I didn't think it would be this easy. I hope the pull request gets accepted. "No method for 'set' " is the error message I get in 0.47, which seems harmless enough.
BTW, I've been meaning to say this for a while: the new readme file is great. It's much more helpful than before, and I really appreciate the work you put into it (and so many other things).
From: Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>
Sent: 29 October 2017 10:20
To: Liam Goodacre
Subject: Re: [PD] A "set" method for [value]
Happy Halloween: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241
Since [value] only works with floats (and not symbols), I think a set message shouldn't break anything and (helpfully) result in "got symbol but expected float" errors in earlier versions of Pd as opposed to non connections with a missing second inlet.
On Oct 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at<mailto:pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
I was thinking that it could be done through the main inlet using a "set" message, just like the tabread and tabwrite objects. But a second inlet might be good also. What could go wrong?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list