[PD] declare vs. namespaces - current best practice

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Sun Jan 7 04:32:24 CET 2018


2018-01-06 7:53 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>:

> > So this is still safe if you're sharing a patch to be first opened on
> its own.
>
> in other words: it's not safe at all ;-)
>

why not? If you first open Pd with a patch that uses [declare], from
someone who shared it, it'll be guaranteed that it works! Given that you
have the library, of course...



>
> > And to come back to my first remark here on this thread, if [declare]
> cannot always force a priority, shouldn't it?
>
> I don't think so. [declare]'s job is to add paths to the search path and
> load libraries. it has nothing to do with namespacing.


> imagine you want to use both [foo/obj] and [bar/obj] in the same
> abstraction. how could you possibly force on or the other with declare?
>

you can't, you can only do that with namespaces, alright, but this is still
a pretty specific use case, and I don't understand what it has to do with
the idea that [declare] should force a priority, which is something it
actually already does as I pointed out...

and ok, it doesn't always do that as we discussed and found out, but then
it's just a matter of "fixing" it...


>
> namespacing by definition involves some kind of extra typing (like it or
> not) to differentiate entities that otherwise would look the same. the
> current mechanism of prepending the folder name already supports that, only
> single-binary libraries are sometimes a problem. cyclone already shows how
> this can be dealt with effectivly by adding a second creator (e.g.
> "cyclone/gate")
>

cyclone doesn't have a second creator for "cyclone/gate". It is not a
single-binary library, but a mix of things, it has a) abstractions, b)
separately compiled objects and c) a single-binary sub pack. For "c" -
which is a library named "cyclone" (that loads non alphanumeric objects) -
we have a second creator, so, given that you first loaded the "cyclone"
(with declare or whatever) you can load an object like >~ as either just
[>~] or also as [cyclone/>~].

This way you can force namespaces into single binary packs.

cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180107/eb8bbc01/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list