[PD] declare vs. namespaces - current best practice

[Christof Ressi]

+1

> Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. Januar 2018 um 20:58 Uhr
> Von: "Lucas Cordiviola" <lucarda27 at hotmail.com>
> An: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Betreff: Re: [PD] declare vs. namespaces - current best practice
>
> I think Joao (the OP) is asking how to do in 2018 what he was doing back 
> on the “extended” years. IRRC he shares his lib which uses many other 
> objects from other libs.
> Now there should be a proper way to do that with the cocktail “Deken, 
> [declare] & namespace”.
> 
> Deken - ? (only issue I know is troubles adding path for pkgs that have 
> “-” in its name)
> 
> [Declare] - We should review 
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/205 because the proposed:
> 
> 1: search relatively to the calling patch
> 2: search the user's global paths
> 3: search Pd's system paths
> 
> Is a good one.
> 
> Namespace – Single binary libs should provide a way call [obj] using 
> namespace.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>