[PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

Miller Puckette msp at ucsd.edu
Wed Jan 10 02:53:34 CET 2018


Yep... the make step is decently fast.  But I almost never just remake without
for some reason having to reconfigure.  This is probably because of my own
file-hygeine habits which date from the 80s, so not relevant to anyone else.

cheers
Miller

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 9, 2018, at 6:17 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> > 
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:17:49 -0800
> > From: Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu <mailto:msp at ucsd.edu>>
> > To: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>>
> > Cc: pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> > Subject: Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started
> > Message-ID: <20180109171749.GB32197 at elroy.localdomain <mailto:20180109171749.GB32197 at elroy.localdomain>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > Yes, FYI I'm still using makefile.gnu.  It takes about 25% as long to do the
> > job as the automake thing does, and when it fails I can usually figure out why.
> 
> The configure step is slow but the actual make part is usually not much slower than a plain makefile since automate generates plain makefiles. However, the configure step gives you easily configurable build options, system checks, library checks, and a helpful configuration output print at the end.
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list