[PD] stale pointers after object creation (was Re: pix_data issue)

Fede camarafede at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 12:17:35 CET 2018

Ok, so it is a combination of editing the canvas and pointer memory

i don’t think it has to do with saving.
also, i don’t think it would relate to the previous pix_data pointer issue

Here’s a patch

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: stale-pointer.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 945 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180228/f18e518e/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------

On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:24 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> On 02/28/2018 10:53 AM, Fede Camara Halac wrote:
>> Would saving (cmd+s) make pix_data forget a pointer, as in [text] or [array] objects when using pointers?
> that sounds very fishy to.
> do you have a patch that exposes the forget-on-save behaviour of [array]
> or [text]?
> gfmdasr
> IOhannes
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

More information about the Pd-list mailing list