[PD] Porting Max MSP externals to Pure Data

Ed Kelly morph_2016 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 8 00:37:12 CET 2018


Hi Jamie,
Yes, I should probably look at that - I can see the limitations of GSL vectors, platform-wise.
I think I needed to wrap my head around that before unpicking the algorithms of this library though, so I'll be going through a rewrite of the rewrite before it becomes a Pd fact!Ed


_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk  

    On Wednesday, 7 March 2018, 14:22:45 GMT, Jamie Bullock <jamie.b.bullock at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 
Hi Ed,
I’d highly recommend porting to Flext rather than Pure Data. Then you have one codebase for both Max and Pd with the added benefit of Flext’s higher level C++ syntax. https://github.com/grrrr/flext/
Jamie


On 4 Mar 2018, at 14:30, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list at lists.iem.at> wrote:
Hi List,
I'm porting a library of LPC externals from Max/MSP to Pd.I wonder if someone could point me towards an example of another MSP external that has successfully been ported to Pd - preferably a DSP external that has creation arguments, with code for both so I can identify the differences between coding for the two platforms.
Cheers,Ed

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk _______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180307/f8ef8b85/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list