[PD] pow/pow~ and negative input, a fix proposal

[Martin Peach]

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
wrote:

> ...
> I personally cannot think of any use case where someone relies on pow(-1,
> 2) generating "0", it just seems wrong to me (i.e. a bug) and allowing it
> to do that wouldn't break things.
>
> Maybe add another outlet for the imaginary part?
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180508/90436ea2/attachment.html>