[PD] [PD-announce] [ARRAST_VJ] - Pure Data/GEM Video Mixer/Mapper - www.arrastvj.org

[Pagano, Patrick]

Its working like a dream her eon my Linux 64 box with a freshly compiled version of GEM

my box is Dual Nvidia Quadros 64GB of RAM and 4TB SSD


Smooth!!


Patrick


Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A

Assistant Professor in Residence

Digital Media & Design

Web & Interactive Technologies

UCONN ECE Faculty Coordinator

University of Connecticut, Stamford

(352)-226-2016


________________________________
From: Pd-list <pd-list-bounces at lists.iem.at> on behalf of Bruno Rohde <brunorohde at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 6:48 PM
To: oliver
Cc: pd-list at mail.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] [PD-announce] [ARRAST_VJ] - Pure Data/GEM Video Mixer/Mapper - www.arrastvj.org

makes sense, since when i'm on windows i always put PD as a standalone version (the .zip package, without installer) on a seperate partition and thus don't know about "space in names" issues ;-)

Good to know, I can possibly suggest this as a strategy for other interested Windows users.

i also have a SSD in my laptop and i'm coming to believe that this is a crucial aspect considering Gem's and PD's performance.
so far i didn't have to use [pd~) to smoothly run audio AND video in the same instance of PD on my laptop (sometimes two HD movies and 3 soundfiles read from disk simultaneously !). i did however encounter those problems on computers using conventional harddisks. just my personal observation ...

Thank you for the informations. I will soon install an SSD on my laptop as well.

Bruno


2018-05-10 15:49 GMT-03:00 oliver <oliver at klingt.org<mailto:oliver at klingt.org>>:
Bruno Rohde wrote:

The reason for the Light version not to play audio is that audio and video playback needs to be performed on 2 instances of the Pd so as not to generate audio clicks as it does in the full version. At the time of development, the object [pd~], used to manage the two instances and their communication, presented a serious problem in Windows, because it was not possible to run a patch located in a path with spaces in the name, and this is standard in Windows (ex: C:/Program Files/). If I am not mistaken, in version 0.48.1 of Pd this issue of [pd~] has been solved, but I have not tested it yet.

makes sense, since when i'm on windows i always put PD as a standalone version (the .zip package, without installer) on a seperate partition and thus don't know about "space in names" issues ;-)


As soon as I have time, I'll run new tests on Windows. I'm excited about your account of having managed to run the full version on Windows. By the way, what version of Windows and Pd are you using?

Win 7 / 64bit
PD 0.48.0
Gem 0.93.3

i also have a SSD in my laptop and i'm coming to believe that this is a crucial aspect considering Gem's and PD's performance.

so far i didn't have to use [pd~) to smoothly run audio AND video in the same instance of PD on my laptop (sometimes two HD movies and 3 soundfiles read from disk simultaneously !). i did however encounter those problems on computers using conventional harddisks. just my personal observation ...

so, running audio and video in seperate threads is definitely the safer way to go


best

oliver

_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at<mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



--
Bruno Faria Rohde
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180510/8922b7a6/attachment-0001.html>