[PD] polynomial pairs in lpc filter

[Ed Kelly]

Oh gosh! Well spotted!

It loads, but I suspect I will have to interrogate the algorithms to make sure they are the correct interpretation of the vDSP algorithms in the original Max objects. This was the main part, and I've been a bit rusty at this - it's got me almost up-to-scratch again. A few more modules to port and it might just work!

Thanks Christof, and all of you...but

Simon Iten - when you've finished your dissertation could you share your results?

Still on it...
Ed


_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk  

    On Friday, 11 May 2018, 01:21:29 GMT+1, Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at> wrote:  
 
 you forgot to return your object (x) in mbc_lpc_tilde_new :-)
 
Christof
 

Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Mai 2018 um 02:06 Uhr
Von: "Ed Kelly via Pd-list" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
An: padovani <zepadovani.lists at gmail.com>
Cc: "Pd list" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
Betreff: Re: [PD] polynomial pairs in lpc filter

Jose...
I've stuck my head in the lion's mouth so I may as well go in for one more bite, although I promise you that IOhannes Zmoelnig is a REALLY NICE GUY.

 
I agree that edkellytista9 is a pretty stupid github name. It was done in a hurry for working on another project, but I'm setting up a more serious one because...you know...presentation is important.
 
I'm using Makefile.pdlibbuilder now - very cool. And deken ekext-0.2 coming soon.
 
I have a house. It's a bit of a dump but has a studio. I don't live there yet. We need to get the builders in!

 

...and my mbc_lpc~ port compiles but spits out an error:
mbc_lpc~: initializing
mbc_lpc~: free memory...
mbc_lpc~: allocated memory
Generating Hamming window for LPC analysis
 mbc_lpc~
... didn't return a patchable object
 mbc_lpc~
... couldn't create
 
I still don't know why. Perhaps Iohannes can help?
Ed
 
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk 
 
 

 

On Monday, 7 May 2018, 09:54:49 GMT+1, padovani <zepadovani.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
 
 

Got late into this discussion, but I'm really interested in this project and would like to help (even if I don't have much experience coding new objects and have been a little busy with my classes at the University).
 
Ed, any further success last weeks? well... also with the house... ;)
 
José H.

 
 

2018-04-23 4:45 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at[mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at]>:On 2018-04-23 00:50, Christof Ressi wrote:
>> - please mark all your functions as static.
>
> except for the setup function, of course. just to prevent a possible source of further frustration :-).
>

ouch.
thanks for pointing that out!



______________________________ _________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at[mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list[https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list]
 
 _______________________________________________ Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list[https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list]  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180511/56d71178/attachment-0001.html>