[PD] Random

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

that's what I was suggesting ;)

2018-05-31 9:15 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>:

> just an idea: what if [seed( without argument would take the current
> system time?
>
> or even seed it with the system time on creation?
>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2018 um 13:36 Uhr
> > Von: "Peter P." <peterparker at fastmail.com>
> > An: pd-list <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> > Betreff: Re: [PD] Random
> >
> > * Marco Matteo Markidis <mm.markidis at gmail.com> [2018-05-30 19:29]:
> > > usually in random number generators one wants to have control on the
> seed
> > > because this allows to have the same numeric streams every time one
> wants.
> >
> > I thought about this and conclude that the help patch should mention the
> > fact that the sequence is always the same even when the object is not
> > explicitely seeded with the [seed ...< message.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180531/3ee820d6/attachment.html>