danomatika at gmail.com
Thu May 31 20:00:40 CEST 2018
Yeah. I could use it as [date] is the only reason I have zexy installed right now.
> On May 31, 2018, at 12:56 PM, hans w. koch <hansw.koch at gmail.com> wrote:
> wouldn´t it be more interesting/useful to incorporate a [date] object into vanilla pd, from which it would be trivial to generate unique seeds, but which also could be used in (many) other contexts?
>> Am 31.05.2018 um 19:21 schrieb Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>:
>> It would relatively easy to add a right outlet to [random]. Another option might be an explicit [seed] object which could give you further control or perhaps some creation flags for [random] as well.
>>>> you still have control on the seed... just seed it
>>> no because you need to add an extra outlet to [random] and prints out the
>>> seed value.
>>>> or even seed it with the system time on creation?
>>> if one adds now this behaviour one need to put a flag for backward
>>>> what if [seed( without argument would take the current system time?
>>> this could be an idea but one need the second outlet.
>>> -Marco Matteo Markidis
>> Dan Wilcox
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list