[PD] [feature request] cloning array define?
christof.ressi at gmx.at
Sun Jun 17 14:00:20 CEST 2018
I already have a PR with a couple of improvements/bug fixes for [clone] (https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/310) and this is something I definitely want to add!
since the clone object owns the canvases, I don't think it would be possible take an existing subpatch, instead clone could give you an empty canvas if you don't provide an abstraction name and you could edit it just like an subpatch. In July I have some time to tinker around.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Juni 2018 um 00:01 Uhr
Von: "Dan Wilcox" <danomatika at gmail.com>
An: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] [feature request] cloning array define?
Doh, "subpath" = subpatCh ... as in [pd foo] -> [clone 16 pd-foo] some how...
On Jun 16, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com[mailto:danomatika at gmail.com]> wrote:
What would be *more useful* would being able to clone a subpath, then I wouldn't need to have a bunch of single-object instantion wrappers around...
On 06/15/2018 11:07 AM, Jaime Oliver La Rosa wrote:Hello all,
Here is a somewhat half-baked feature request.
It would be great to be able to clone objects such as array.
like the attached abstraction?
[clone arraydefine 16 foo-]
Would this be possible?
i don't really see the point of adding syntactic sugar that can be
trivially implemented with a single-object abstraction wrapper.
_______________________________________________ Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list[https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list]
More information about the Pd-list