[PD] big bounce writesf~

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2018-06-18 16:30, Jean-Marie Adrien wrote:
> … i think i did
> just a question : is it possible to chain in a cascade :          throw~     ->     catch~    ->    throw~    ->     catch~     ??
> hum, is chained indeed in the patch

your question is lacking details.

since throw/catch is a N-to-1 connection, you cannot have more than one
[catch~] of any given name.
so the following patch is illegal and will print an error on the console:

[osc~ 440]
|
[throw~ foo]

[catch~ foo]
|
[throw~ foo]

[catch~ foo]
|
[env~]

(it will give you an error "warning: foo: multiply defined")

however, you can easily and without problems chain up throw/catchs with
different names:


[osc~ 440]
|
[throw~ foo]

[catch~ foo]
|
[throw~ bar]

[catch~ bar]
|
[env~]


using [throw~] and [catch~] without any explicit name (as in your
question), will use an empty symbol "" (without the quotes) as the label.
so to answer your question: not it's not possible to chain it up like
that, as you are having multiple [catch~] objects with the same name.


fgmasdr
IOhannes


side note for confusion: when chaining up multiple catch~/throw~ or
s~/r~ objects, the order of execution  may vary. so the output of the
last [catch~] object might be delayed by one or more sample blocks (as
compared to input of the first [throw~]). but the signal will come
through nicely (just delayed slightly).

PPS: have you checked phase cancellation?




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180618/5bc1e082/attachment.sig>