[PD] comments in [text]

[Martin Hiendl]

Thanks, yes, that makes sense. I'm not using the [text] outlets but rather
using global sends in [text sequence -g]. A dummy [r #] does the trick in
this case.



On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 11:17, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 10:34 +0200, Martin Hiendl wrote:
>
> > I was wondering whether there is a comment function for the [text]
> > object that I'm not aware of, or if not, whether that would be a
> > useful feature (for handling and navigating large cue-lists for
> > example).
>
>
> How about this:
>
> Mark your comments with a '# '-prefix (mind the space). When parsing
> the content of [text], make sure to pipe everything to [route #] and
> consider only the right outlet of [route #]. There you go!
>
> Roman_______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


-- 
martinhiendl.com
+49 171 1929188
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180712/a0567dc8/attachment.html>