[PD] triggering [print~] faster than every 64 samples
Christof Ressi
christof.ressi at gmx.at
Sat Jul 28 11:43:13 CEST 2018
the technical reason is that clock timeouts can't happen in intervals smaller than 64 samples (pd's scheduler blocksize) *), so any objects relying on clocks (e.g. [print~], [bang~], [line~], [vline~], [del], [pipe], etc) might not work as expected.
Christof
*) more generally, clock timeouts are limited to the largest parent blocksize. see attached patch.
> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Juli 2018 um 10:45 Uhr
> Von: "mario buoninfante" <mario.buoninfante at gmail.com>
> An: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Betreff: [PD] triggering [print~] faster than every 64 samples
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to trigger [print~] every sample. in the same patch I'm using
> [block~ 1 1 1] to change the block size and [metro 1 1 samp] to trigger
> [print~].
>
> but I noticed that [print~] is yes printing 1 sample at time (in accord
> with the block size) but only every 64 samples. so it receives a bang
> every sample but prints every 64 (default block size).
>
> can you guys help me understanding why? I'm pretty sure I'm missing
> something here :D
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Mario
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clock_test.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1010 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180728/72cfbbc8/attachment.obj>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list