[PD] [closebang] issue ...

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2018-08-28 01:50, oliver wrote:
>> one could argue that Pd should really send the "closebang" message in
>> the same order as "loadbang" (subpatches first and before any object
>> is actually deleted)...
> 
> or even that PD would need a native [closebang] ;-)
> 

why?
(of course you could wish for each and every object that is currently
not native to Pd to be included; but what makes [closebang] so special
that it should be included? it's widespread use cases?)

fgamdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180829/3c9fd683/attachment.sig>