[PD] [closebang] issue ...
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Aug 29 09:42:13 CEST 2018
On 2018-08-28 01:50, oliver wrote:
>> one could argue that Pd should really send the "closebang" message in
>> the same order as "loadbang" (subpatches first and before any object
>> is actually deleted)...
> or even that PD would need a native [closebang] ;-)
(of course you could wish for each and every object that is currently
not native to Pd to be included; but what makes [closebang] so special
that it should be included? it's widespread use cases?)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Pd-list