[PD] [closebang] issue ...

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 18:19:46 CEST 2018

+1 I think it should be native as well. It's a logical complement to [loadbang] and is one of those few things I need in PdParty that I've implemented using a wrapper around a message to [r #closebang].

> On Aug 29, 2018, at 5:37 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:58:29 -0300
> From: José de Abreu <abreubacelar at gmail.com <mailto:abreubacelar at gmail.com>>
> To: oliver <oliver at klingt.org <mailto:oliver at klingt.org>>
> Cc: pd-list at mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at mail.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] [closebang] issue ...
> Save on patching closing is a strong point for having a native closebang.
> But, on the other side, why is not good to have closebang as native?

Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180829/dd4e46e2/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list