[PD] multiple instances of a patch forbidden in 0.49, why?

[Roman Haefeli]

On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
> Of course [once] would be much better than [lock]....

[once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence
should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new
objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a
[once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move.

Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180922/28ccd4a9/attachment.sig>