[PD] multiple instances of a patch forbidden in 0.49, why?

[Antoine Rousseau]

thanks Miller, it works perfectly!

Antoine Rousseau
  http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __
http://www.metaluachahuter.com/
<http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/>



Le dim. 23 sept. 2018 à 00:37, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> a écrit :

> Well, I ended up simply reverting to the old behavior but leaving a hook in
> so that users can specifically ask only to open a patch once.
>
> cheers
> M
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 12:10:01AM +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
> > Yes I realized that. So it should be something more specific.
> > Why not a wider scope object, like [pdconfig], that would take "once" as
> an
> > argument?
> >
> > Antoine Rousseau
> >   http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __
> > http://www.metaluachahuter.com/
> > <http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/>
> >
> >
> >
> > Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 ?? 23:55, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> a
> ??crit :
> >
> > > On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
> > > > Of course [once] would be much better than [lock]....
> > >
> > > [once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence
> > > should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new
> > > objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a
> > > [once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move.
> > >
> > > Roman_______________________________________________
> > > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180923/f4c4926a/attachment.html>