[PD] array vs text, avoiding duplication

[Max]

I found Enriques patch in the archive and solved it like he did.
Attached just in case someone is wondering. It's probably some 
depth-first thing why my first approach didn't work as expected.

m.


On 30.12.18 22:10, Max wrote:
> Ah, cool. Thanks IOhannes.
> 
> I tried a Pd implementation but can't get it to work. Do you know why my 
> approach fails?
> 
> I see that NetPd has a singleton message, will try to analyze how it's 
> done there.
> 
> m.
> 
> 
> On 24.12.18 11:40, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 12/23/18 9:06 PM, Max wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a smart way to solve this kind of issue?
>>>
>>
>> search for "singleton".
>>
>> gadsmr
>> IOhannes
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hex-tunings.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 132 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20181231/4169a932/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: main.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 513 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20181231/4169a932/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: singleton.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 1048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20181231/4169a932/attachment-0002.bin>