[PD] vanilla partitioned convolution abstraction

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

Hi, I tested your patch with the [phasor~ 5] and with [phasor~ 1] I find
the issue you're bringing up gets much more evident

Em qua, 9 de jan de 2019 às 14:03, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 13:44 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > hmm, weird, I don't seem to find problems...
>
> Aha? Even with attached test3.pd patch saved along the original test.pd
> patch? You can compare 64 to 128 and I get a glitchy tone with a
> frequency of 690 Hz (which seems to come from 44100/64).
>
> Have you tried other IRs than the church.wav and IR.wav?
>
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20190109/6afdfd15/attachment-0001.html>