[PD] vanilla partitioned convolution abstraction

[Max]

Interesting stuff!
However, I have hickups in the sound (dropouts) even though the CPU load 
is around 20% only. What might cause them?

m.

On 11.01.19 04:14, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Hi Philipp, so, I checked in depth and revised your patch. Here's my 
> take on it in a similar design of my last object.
> 
> I changed a lot of things and rewrote basically everything, so there 
> might be something funny still and things may not match, but the basic 
> stuff seem to be equivalent and the basic parameters like block size and 
> delay seem to match.
> 
> anyway, this is also fully vanilla and the prototype is called [conv2~].
> 
> I am precomputing the FFT, so check it out, and also check the rest as 
> I've changed much of your computations for something that's simpler I think.
> 
> here's the link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8l85y7p1knjv2i/conv2~.zip?dl=0
> 
> cheers
> 
> Em qua, 9 de jan de 2019 às 20:46, Philipp Schmalfuß 
> <philipp.schmalfuss at uni-weimar.de 
> <mailto:philipp.schmalfuss at uni-weimar.de>> escreveu:
> 
>     yes, i get the same glitchy tone, even worse with smaller blocksizes.
>     I wasn't aware of this, thanks for the hint! will try to fix this
> 
> 
>     Quoting Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com
>     <mailto:porres at gmail.com>>:
> 
>      > Hi, I tested your patch with the [phasor~ 5] and with [phasor~ 1]
>     I find
>      > the issue you're bringing up gets much more evident
>      >
>      > Em qua, 9 de jan de 2019 às 14:03, Roman Haefeli
>     <reduzent at gmail.com <mailto:reduzent at gmail.com>>
>      > escreveu:
>      >
>      >> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 13:44 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>      >> > hmm, weird, I don't seem to find problems...
>      >>
>      >> Aha? Even with attached test3.pd patch saved along the original
>     test.pd
>      >> patch? You can compare 64 to 128 and I get a glitchy tone with a
>      >> frequency of 690 Hz (which seems to come from 44100/64).
>      >>
>      >> Have you tried other IRs than the church.wav and IR.wav?
>      >>
>      >> Roman
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> _______________________________________________
>      >> Pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at> mailing list
>      >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>      >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>      >>
>      >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>