[PD] non-socket (88)
michael strohmann
itsnotfair9 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 17 11:53:57 CET 2019
This non-socket(88) gives me the creeps because it seems to freeze pd immediately without any possibility to recover/interact with pd. Also I could find out what caused the non-socket Problem - actually don’t know where to look...
Am 17.02.2019 um 10:52 schrieb Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>:
>> in the meantime, are there any options to send osc via udp regardless of the existance of a receiver?
>
> You can use the workaround described by iohannes in the github issue: simply reconnect whenever the socket is closed (catching the 0 message). I want to really make a PR for those network issues, can you open an issue on github for your problem (88)? I have time in march.
>
>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Februar 2019 um 09:23 Uhr
>> Von: "michael strohmann" <itsnotfair9 at gmail.com>
>> An: "Lucas Cordiviola" <lucarda27 at hotmail.com>
>> Cc: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
>> Betreff: Re: [PD] non-socket (88)
>>
>> i am sending OSC messages with [netsend -u -b]
>>
>> there is obviously an issue with [netsend] closing the socket if nobody is listening.
>> which it should not do in UDP mode.
>> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/373 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/373>
>>
>> but this:
>>
>> netsend: Socket operation on non-socket (88)
>>
>> is lethal to my patch. immediate freeze
>> unfortunatly it occurs quite often.
>>
>> i also know next to nothing about Sockets
>> is it a pd problem or does it stem from the os (unix jessie in my case, on raspberry) ???
>>
>> also due to Christof Ressi:
>> I can confirm that both [iemnet/udpsend] [mrpeach/udpsend] (from Pd extended) close the socket on Linux but only [mrpeach/udpsend] gives a warning and sends a 0. I'll do a bug report.
>>
>> in the meantime, are there any options to send osc via udp regardless of the existance of a receiver?
>>
>> cheers!
>> michael
>>
>>
>>> On 16 Feb 2019, at 20:06, Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you tried sending every second an empty message [send ( instead of
>>> "reopening a connection" ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>>>
>>>> On 2/16/2019 3:57 PM, michael strohmann wrote:
>>>> i finally could caught pd in the act of freezing:
>>>>
>>>> the console said:
>>>>
>>>> recv: Connection refused (111)
>>>> netsend: Socket operation on non-socket (88)
>>>> warning: 33 removed from poll list but not found
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i connect every second to mobile phones that run Lemur to send and receive OSC
>>>> usually if a phone leaves the network, nothing bad happens, the console says:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> recv: Connection refused (111)
>>>> netsend: Bad file descriptor (9)
>>>> warning: 32 removed from poll list but not found
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So it seems to me that this non-socket(88) problem manages to freeze pd
>>>> (or is it this number: 88, which has a bad connotation in austria ?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list