[PD] Tcl/Tk error

Christof Ressi christof.ressi at gmx.at
Tue Apr 2 11:53:53 CEST 2019


hey oliver,

other users (including myself) have experienced this as well and it's a serious regression. Now that I have some time I want to investigate this. I've already fixed a related bug in September (https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/467).

can you do me a favour and file a bug report on GitHub? and can you try to find a minimal patch which triggers the problem (even if it doesn't happen all the time)? personally, I didn't have success in reproducing it, it only happenes very rarely and seemlingly randomly...
to all the other people who have experienced this: please help!

Christof

> Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. April 2019 um 11:37 Uhr
> Von: "oliver" <oliver at klingt.org>
> An: "pd-list at mail.iem.at" <pd-list at mail.iem.at>
> Betreff: [PD] Tcl/Tk error
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for a not so precise bug-report, but it's all i can offer:
>
> recently i discovered a strange behaviour in Windows PD 0.49 (32bit)
> when the closing of a patch window (or even the closing of a subpatch
> window) would result in a Tcl/Tk error that i have not excperienced up
> until PD 0.49.
>
> so, i close a window (main or subpatch - mostly with STRG+w), the patch
> window turns white with some inlet relics still being displayed and the
> console prints out a Tcl/TK error message in red colour.
>
> the console says for example this:
>
> (Tcl) UNHANDLED ERROR: bad window path name ".x3b212c8"
>      while executing
> "wm title $mytoplevel "$name$dirtychar$arguments - $path""
>      (procedure "pdtk_canvas_reflecttitle" line 15)
>      invoked from within
> "pdtk_canvas_reflecttitle .x3b212c8 {D:/pd_0.49/_MYPATCHES_/MFPOW}
> {metronome} { [edit]} 0"
>      ("uplevel" body line 718)
>      invoked from within
> "uplevel #0 $docmds".x2596028: no such object
> .x2596028: no such object
> .x2596028: no such object
> .x2596028: no such object
>
>
> from this point on nothing can be done in PD anymore, the only way to
> get out of this is to kill the PD process from the outside.
>
> the patch contains several GOP subpatches and also some of my own GUI
> abstractions, that contain GOPs.
>
> (the patch is very involved so i couldn't really check what would
> happen, if i replaced all of my abstractions with something else ...)
>
> any ideas ? ...
>
> best
>
> oliver
>
>
> --
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> /////////////// http://pendler.klingt.org //////////////
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ http://oliver.klingt.org  \\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>





More information about the Pd-list mailing list