[PD] OSC data from [list trim]

[Roman Haefeli]

On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 18:46 +0200, Christof Ressi wrote:
> I think the problem lies somewhere else. There is a fundamental issue
> with [oscparse]: it breaks the address pattern into its parts and
> forms a Pd list, but treats numbers as symbols. 

Ah, thanks for pointing this out. From the original post it was (at
least for me) not quite clear whether it was about the OSC atoms (the
actual payload) or the OSC path. 

Good to know that numeric path elements end up (actually: are
preserved) as symbols in Pd after [oscparse].

Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20190713/9124ec59/attachment.sig>