[PD] single/double change for hradio/vradio?
Alexandre Torres Porres
porres at gmail.com
Sat Jul 27 02:53:29 CEST 2019
Em sex, 26 de jul de 2019 às 18:09, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
escreveu:
> Am 26. Juli 2019 17:14:24 MESZ schrieb Matt Davey <hard.off at gmail.com>:
> >yeah i couldn't see what happens either.
>
>
> ah well. those messages are for the old vdial object, which is another
> (and deprecated) flavour of vradio.
>
> just instantiate the object as `[vdl]` and try again.
>
by looking at the code, it seemed there was the intention that it could
also take effect on the new incarnation, so I don't know if this is a bug
then, now that it doesn't take any effect.
But I just think that the best alternative here is to remove these messages
from the documentation of both [hradio] and [vradio]. I've been doing an
extensive revision of Pd's documentation (that's how I bumped into this),
so I think I'll just do this commit and reference to this discussion.
thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20190726/8562bbcc/attachment.html>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list