[PD] pix_delay argument

Bastiaan van den Berg buzz at spacedout.nl
Mon Aug 26 13:48:12 CEST 2019


I think that would require a infinite fast computer ;) There will always be
a delay (at -least- 1 frame of the gem head)

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:04 AM Peter P. <peterparker at fastmail.com> wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> can it be that if pix_delay is being sent a "frame delay" into its right
> inlet that is the same as its argument (max delay) it will not delay at
> all?
>
> cheers, P
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20190826/f422c8c0/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list