[PD] opening patch from pd message
peterparker at fastmail.com
Tue Nov 26 16:59:10 CET 2019
* IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2019-11-26 16:03]:
> Am 26. November 2019 15:49:07 MEZ schrieb Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>:
> >On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:12 +0100, Csaba Láng wrote:
> >> Dear list,
> >> I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
> >> [;
> >> pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
> >> just to be clear, if I want to open cat.pd, a message [cat( will not
> >> make it happen.
> >Use [symbol cat(.
> and if you have many, many files (msgboxes) you can convert (almost) any selector toa symbol with [symbol]:
jumping on this I must admit that I never understood when a selector
such as "symbol" or "list" has to be provided explicitely, or to be
>From https://puredata.info/docs/manuals/pd/x2.htm#s3.1 I understand that
has an implicit selector of "float" and is equivalent to
Also the message
[1 2 3(
has an implicit selector of "list" and is equivalent to
[list 1 2 3(
It seems the selector is always a symbol (one or many characters
without whitespace nor semicolons nor commas).
It seems symbols themselves have no selector(?) as
seems to be the selector "foo" itself and is not the same as
at least not when printing to the console window.
Now is this why
in the original poster's question did not have a selector "symbol" and
one had to be added eg. with [symbol]. Was this because it was used in
another message box or in a $1 substitution?
A message [stop( to a [delay] object does not require "stop" to be
prefixed by a "symbol" selector.
Why does this still seem a mixup of symbols with and symbols without a
"symbol" selector to me? Can this be clarified somehow?
Thanks to everyone,
More information about the Pd-list