[PD] pd for oscilloscopes again

Christof Ressi christof.ressi at gmx.at
Wed Dec 4 09:53:51 CET 2019


I never said PurrData has *all* libraries (which would be impossible)

> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. Dezember 2019 um 03:35 Uhr
> Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <porres at gmail.com>
> An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.ressi at gmx.at>
> Cc: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Betreff: Re: [PD] pd for oscilloscopes again
>
> Em ter., 3 de dez. de 2019 às 16:04, Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>
> escreveu:
> 
> > > I'm surprised no one has assembled a package of all the things you'd need
> >
> >
> 
> > different people need different things.
> >
> 
> Yeah, I don't think there's such a thing, as this would vary. Not sure if
> this comes from the idea that we should pack libraries that were in Pd
> Extended in a single download, which I'd also have thoughts against.
> 
> 
> > if you're looking for a modern Pd with "batteries included", you can try
> > PurrData. but once you've figured out which libraries you need, it's easy
> > to just use Pd vanilla + Deken.
> >
> 
> Yeah, this is where I'd say, but I do propose Purr Data with the remarks
> that it doesn't have "ALL YOU NEED" . And saying that then you can just use
> deken later also gives a wrong idea, because there are many new libraries
> are only in deken and not in Purr Data, plus some of the verisions in deken
> are more up to date. So I'd say Purr Data's got some (ok, actually a lot)
> of batteries included, but not "all" (as in "all you need").
> 
> Sorry for nit picking
> 
> cheers
>





More information about the Pd-list mailing list