[PD] How to make a large patch performant

[Andrew Lyons]

Hi,

My pure data patch has grown beyond the processing power of my Raspberry
pi. I am looking at software options to make it performant again:

1./ Heavy compiler
2./ Convert abstractions to extensions.

Recommendations? Suggestions?

Thanks

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 9:43 AM Gabriel Lecup <lecupgabriel at gmail.com> wrote:

> So regarding double precision: is there a way to have long varispeed
> without using externals?
> I've been banging my head for quite some time, and it seems this is still
> a major drawback for casual users like myself ...
>
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 12:20, William Huston <williamahuston at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As others have stated, 64-bit architecture vs 32 bit, has nothing to do
>> with a Single Precision Float vs. Double.
>>
>> Yes, one can bitcrush from Double also.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 10:14 AM Adenosina Tri Phosfato <porres at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Em sáb., 4 de jan. de 2020 às 12:24, William Huston <
>>> williamahuston at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Funny, I have grown to like the "bitcrush" style distortion
>>>> from using the existing single-precision method.
>>>>
>>>
>>> but you can do bitcrush and reduce resolution from 64bits as well,
>>> right?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200105/1bf0ba9f/attachment.html>