[PD] How to make a large patch performant

Andrew Lyons tstexture at gmail.com
Sun Jan 5 19:23:34 CET 2020


Thanks!

[pd~] is news to me. Will research...

Cheers

(Sorry for not trimming)


On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 10:18 AM Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> have you tried splitting the workload across several cores, e.g. with
> [pd~]? This worked quite well for me.
>
> If this isn't possible or not enough, then rewriting parts of your patch
> as externals can definitely give a significant performance boost.
>
> Christof
>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 05. Januar 2020 um 18:54 Uhr
> Von: "Andrew Lyons" <tstexture at gmail.com>
> An: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>
> Betreff: [PD] How to make a large patch performant
>
> Hi,
>
>
> My pure data patch has grown beyond the processing power of my Raspberry
> pi. I am looking at software options to make it performant again:
>
> 1./ Heavy compiler
> 2./ Convert abstractions to extensions.
>
> Recommendations? Suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200105/6472ce0a/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list