[PD] MIDI 2.0 in Pd?
danomatika at gmail.com
Mon Feb 3 09:56:17 CET 2020
In general, the plans seem to fall on whoever needs it first, then whoever wants to actually do it. I overhauled the MIDI handling a couple years ago now, so hopefully it won't be too difficult to extend what we have if someone wants to jump into byte protocols. I'm mildly interested but it will take a while until I can get around to it.
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 3:39 AM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:28:56 +0900
> From: Julián Villegas <villegas.julian at gmail.com <mailto:villegas.julian at gmail.com>>
> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: [PD] MIDI 2.0 in Pd?
> Message-ID: <EB10B5F8-3FB3-44B3-99C2-2E8DE2C08DFD at gmail.com <mailto:EB10B5F8-3FB3-44B3-99C2-2E8DE2C08DFD at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> I came across this:
> https://www.midi.org/articles-old/details-about-midi-2-0-midi-ci-profiles-and-property-exchange <https://www.midi.org/articles-old/details-about-midi-2-0-midi-ci-profiles-and-property-exchange>
> and I was wondering if there are plans to upgrade Pd to fully use the new version of this protocol… To be honest, this is an ambitious plan for me to develop myself but I’d be happy to contribute.
> Have a nice week,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list