[PD] samplerate~

[Matt Davey]

Just wondering how cpu intensive the samplerate~ object is?

Is it just receiving from a value inside of pd, or does it need to retrieve
directly from hardware every time?

We've been running into issues with [loadbang] to samplerate~ and having
the rate change after our loadbangs, so were considering using [bang~].

Would that be reasonable, even if we might have to do it a few
hundred times?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200218/b9520c54/attachment.html>