peterparker at fastmail.com
Tue Feb 18 11:56:35 CET 2020
* IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2020-02-18 10:30]:
> remember, that a [loadbang] in a child-patch fires after a [loadbang] in
> the parent patch (this is by design).
Does "child-patch" mean subpatches as well as abstractions?
> if you have a child-patch that uses [loadbang] to query [samplerate~],
> and in a parent-patch you use another [loadbang] to change the
> re-sampling, then the re-sampling will change *after* you have queried
> the samplerate.
I can't seem to understand the logic of the sequence of the three
loadbangs in this example. Why would "another" loadbang in the parent
patch fire after the one in the child-patch?
More information about the Pd-list