[PD] Changing Send/Receive Names After Instantiation

[Francis Blair]

Thank you all for your responses! I think I've found a solution that can
work. Basically what I did was create an abstraction where the first
argument is $0 and has a receive object inside with the name $1-parent. It
was right under my nose the whole time, but thank you all for helping me
sniff it out!

Best,

Francis



On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:55 PM Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com>
wrote:

> changing the receiver is dangerous (as in: could crash your system).
>
> Yes. Actually, I've experimented with different ways to make it safe, see:
>
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/614
>
> or
>
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/849
>
> I think the second version is not too unreasonable.
>
> Christof
>
>
> On 25.03.2020 17:27, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
> On 3/25/20 5:04 PM, Ingo wrote:
>
> If you don't have any problem with using externals you can use [iemlib/iem_send].
>
> what's that for?
>
> i mean: what is the advantage over [send] (without arguments)?
>
>
> That's what I use. There is also a [iem_receive] in case that you
> happen to need that.
>
> changing the receiver is dangerous (as in: could crash your system).
>
>
> gfmdasr
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200325/d2ebc371/attachment.html>