[PD] Fwd: Re: Data structures: object placement order

Laure M. Hiendl laure at martinhiendl.com
Mon May 18 18:22:32 CEST 2020


Easy :) Thank you!


On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 16:56, Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you can easily verify this behavior with the help patch of [append]
>
> Christof
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [PD] Data structures: object placement order
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 16:55:14 +0200
> From: Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com>
> To: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
>
>
> Hi Laure,
>
> data structures are displayed according to their position in the list, meaning that objects with a higher index will be shown on top of objects with a lower index.
>
> There is, however, a bug/inconsistency:
>
> If you move (not only click) a scalar, it will always show on top of any other scalar. If you close and open the window, the original order is restored.
>
> Christof
>
> On 18.05.2020 15:55, Laure M. Hiendl wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have a quick question about the object placement in data structures.
> What determines which object lies on top, and which goes in the
> background? Instantiation and creation order don't seem to affect the
> placement order (but maybe that's also a problem in my patch…)
>
> Thanks!
>
> xo
> Laure
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



-- 
Laure M. Hiendl (they/them)
lauremhiendl.com
+49 171 1929188





More information about the Pd-list mailing list