[PD] Please keep deken package online

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

Em seg., 8 de jun. de 2020 às 12:47, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
escreveu:

>
> You make it sound like I have some authority. I don't mean to make that
> impression. The only relevant point (IMHO) is my suggestion to leave
> stuff that is released and used by people untouched. Why? To make life
> easier for you and for ELSE users. And it is simply a suggestion. If
> you disagree, that's fine.
>

Cool, fair enough. I don't mean to make it sound like that though. If
anything, I'm respecting your opinion/feedback and that's all. You can see
a new release has been finally put out! I'm putting the last one back
untouched as requested as well. It really bothers me that now that
searching for 'else' gives you 2 different naming standards, but the task
to change it to manually include the tutorial and upload the pack is so
painfully tedious and long that I'm letting it go... I don't wanna deal
with that process until necessary with further releases. And after a couple
of new releases are up, I guess I won't resist cleaning up this odd one
out (though I'm still not sure if I'm keeping this new standard).


> Please do not care about my script.
>

I was curious how it worked, as I could maybe use it myself...  guess I'll
ask you off list. Also I was just worried if the new standard would screw
you up... anyway, if you don't want to talk about it here, feel free to
give some feedback on this new naming standard by replying to my release
announcement if you want.

cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200609/6772b427/attachment.html>