[PD] pd_defaultbang to non-default list handler

[Jonathan Wilkes]

   > On Saturday, June 20, 2020, 4:02:44 PM EDT, Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com> wrote:  
 
 > Hi, the selector for a list method certainly shouldn't be "bang", rather it should be "list". 

Let's back up.
Miller,
In pd_defaultbang, what is the reasoning for calling the list method with a null selector while calling the 
anything method with an "&s_bang" selector?
Thanks,Jonathan

> There has been a discussion about this in the past and I have agree with IOhannes that Pd shouldn't send NULL selectors: https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/555/.
 
 
> Christof
 
 On 20.06.2020 21:19, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
  
 
 Hi Miller, 
  In pd_defaultbang of m_class.c, why does the list method get called with "0" for a selector instead of "&s_bang" for the c_listmethod invocation? 
  Best, Jonathan
   
  _______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
 _______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200620/d8faec46/attachment-0001.html>