[PD] one abstraction, different delay lines?
jakkesprinter at web.de
Sat Jul 4 16:23:03 CEST 2020
Thanks for that advice! I am using [switch~]es inside the [clone]d „instrument collection“ that is sitting in front of the cloned delay effect. But you are right, adding this functionality to the delay effect instances will surely safe some cpu, too😊
> Am 01.07.2020 um 12:30 schrieb Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>:
> (My mail program mangled this message for some reason, so I copy/pasted the quote below. I hope it's the correct one to respond to...)
>> Right now I have the master audio stream (= the audio of all matrices) going into the clone object, so it sounds like i have several delay effects with different settings on the master channel. It sounds nice, but it is not what I want right now:)
> Jakob, the next step would be to add a [switch~] object to each of the instances inside the clone object, then enable/disable based which one you want to use. That could work as dsp will not be performed on those which are switched off, saving CPU.
> A simple solution is for each instance to accept an "on" message with a float (1 or 0) to enable/disable. Then to enable as ingle one, send a [all on 0< message followed by the single one to enable, [1 on 1<.
>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:31:57 +0200
>> From: Jakob Laue <jakkesprinter at web.de>
>> To: Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com>
>> Cc: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
>> Subject: Re: [PD] one abstraction, different delay lines?
>> <trinity-6b0b8585-789d-4804-8ea8-2e84792187b9-1593516717310 at 3c-app-webde-bap20>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200630/9648c0c4/attachment-0001.html>
> Dan Wilcox
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list