[PD] New "fast-forward" message
Alexandre Torres Porres
porres at gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 16:52:31 CEST 2020
I'm having a problem using 'fast-forward' in a patch loaded via [pd~].
I'm doing this to test if I don't get an audio dropout in the main patch by
running the batch in a pd subprocess.
The patch runs fine and generates 10 min of white noise. This does cause an
audio dropout (much shorter than I expected, wow), so yeah, time to test it
inside [pd~]. What happens? No audio is generated at all, I get an audio
with 0 seconds.
Perhaps this is something that got overlooked (allowing 'fast-forward' in
If so, clearly, this is something we'd all agree would be great to have,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list