[PD] deken and pd -noprefs

[Christof Ressi]

FWIW, I cannot reproduce this here on Windows. "-noprefs" doesn't make a 
difference for Deken and I can see all the libraries you've mentioned.

What is your system?

Christof

On 24.08.2020 16:29, cyrille henry wrote:
> ok, my guess are probably wrong, you can ignore them.
> the fact are :
> starting "pd -noprefs", a deken search for nusmuk gives me :
>
> deken-plugin/0.5.0 (Deken externals downloader)
>     Uploaded by zmoelnig @ 2018-06-05 21:38:10
>
> deken-plugin/0.4.1 (Deken externals downloader)
>     Uploaded by zmoelnig @ 2018-04-05 11:59:59
>
> deken-plugin/0.3.1 (Deken externals downloader - MINIMUM VERSION 
> REQUIRED FOR NEW PACKAGES)
>     Uploaded by zmoelnig @ 2018-04-05 12:00:26
>
> it's not the desired result.
>
>
>
> starting "pd", a deken search for nusmuk gives me :
>
> nusmuk-utils[v2015](Darwin-amd64-32)(Darwin-i386-32)(Linux-amd64-32)(Windows-i386-32)(Sources).dek 
>
>     Mis en ligne par 'chnry' le : 2019-03-13 10:12:20
>
> nusmuk-audio[v2015](Darwin-amd64-32)(Darwin-i386-32)(Linux-amd64-32)(Linux-i386-32)(Windows-i386-32)(Sources).dek 
>
>     Mis en ligne par 'chnry' le : 2019-03-13 10:11:12
>
> nusmuk-utils[v2019](Darwin-amd64-32)(Darwin-i386-32)(Sources).dek
>     Mis en ligne par 'chnry' le : 2019-04-03 16:53:21
>
> nusmuk-utils[v2015](Windows-amd64-32)(Sources).dek
>     Mis en ligne par 'lucarda' le : 2019-03-15 21:15:54
>
> nusmuk-audio[v2015](Windows-amd64-32)(Sources).dek
>     Mis en ligne par 'lucarda' le : 2019-03-15 21:13:43
>
> it's the desired result.
> can someone else confirm this behaviour?
>
> I also tried pmpd, shmem and various other libs, with the same kind of 
> result in both case (with and without -noprefs flag)
>
> cheers
>
>
> Le 24/08/2020 à 16:16, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>> On 24.08.20 15:16, cyrille henry wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Is it the desired behaviours that deken did not find externals when 
>>> used
>>> with "pd -noprefs" ?
>>> It look like deken propose only already downloaded externals, but not
>>> the one on the server.
>>
>> hmm, that would be weird as deken does not keep track of installed
>> externals.
>>
>>>
>>> I suppose a part of deken is not loaded when pd is started with 
>>> -noprefs
>>> flag, but is that really what we want?
>>
>> hmm, that would be weird as well.
>> i'm not aware of any deken component that would interact with "-noprefs"
>> (actually i think that deken - being run only on the GUI-side)
>> completely ignores the "-noprefs" flag, for good or bad)
>>
>> could you post a complete search-string and the desired and actual
>> result (which externals are you searching; which results to you get;
>> which results did you expect?) ...1
>>
>>> (if not, I'll fill a bug report)
>>
>> ...either here on the list or in new bugreport.
>>
>>
>> gfsdmar
>> IOhannes
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list