[PD] deken and pd -noprefs

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 25.08.20 10:35, cyrille henry wrote:
> why did the new plugin did not overwrite the old one, just like without
> this flag?

iirc, there's some logic built into Pd to prevent double loading of plugins.

(this does not effect the built-in deken, as it comes under a slightly
different filename and/or because the "built-in plugins" bypass the
protection)

gfmnasdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200825/5d008b18/attachment.sig>